Anthony Horowitz – The House of Silk

09 +00002012-11-24T11:00:19+00:0030 2012 § 2 Comments

I’ve just finished reading The House of Silk, by Anthony Horowitz.  Published last year, it is a modern addition to the Sherlock Holmes canon that was commissioned by the Conan Doyle estate.  Usually I hate prequels and sequels to well-known classics that have been written by present-day authors, so I began this one with a certain amount of scepticism as well as curiosity.  However, I finished it in two sittings and I am full of praise.  It is excellent!  Not only does Anthony Horowitz succeed in capturing exactly the rhythms of Conan Doyle’s prose and in devising a plot that could have come straight from the brain of the master, but his novel also seems to me to be historically accurate; I can find no jarring anachronisms in his depiction of late nineteenth-century London (and I have read many books that were written during this period).  Furthermore, the novel resonates with the modern reader by exploring a topic that is, unfortunately, much in the news at the moment: the abuse of vulnerable children.

I still wonder, though, why do it?  I can understand why Anthony Horowitz agreed to it, of course!  But why did the Conan Doyle estate want this extra book?  Why are we so fascinated with modern takes on eras and situations that have already been written about brilliantly by contemporary writers?  It is the Downton Abbey syndrome.  I can’t explain it.

§ 2 Responses to Anthony Horowitz – The House of Silk

  • Christina – I’m very glad you enjoyed The House of Silk. And your post raises such an interesting question! Why do we keep returning to those particular eras? As you know, Horowitz is by no means the only one to return to the Conan Doyle stories, and there are many other examples of the kind of thing you mean. I remember feeling the same way about Michael Crichton’s The Great Train Robbery, which is about the 1855 robbery of the Southeastern Railway. Certain eras really have some sort of appeal. I can’t explain it either, but you’re right; it’s there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Anthony Horowitz – The House of Silk at Christina James, crime novelist.

meta

%d bloggers like this: